Tuesday, June 16, 2015

You Are "Pro-Life", but Are You Catholic?

The greatest moment in all of human history was when a humble virgin co-operated with the Holy Will of God and consented to become the Mother of God bearing within her Womb the Second Person of the most Blessed Trinity.  It was at this moment that Eve’s disobedience was undone and our salvation secured for into the world had come the Savior.
"Consequently, then, Mary the Virgin is found to be obedient, saying: 'Behold, O Lord, your handmaid; be it done to me according to your word.' Eve, however, was disobedient; and when yet a virgin, she did not obey.... having become disobedient, was made the cause of death for herself and for the whole human race; so also Mary, betrothed to a man but nevertheless a virgin, being obedient, was made the cause of salvation for herself and for the whole human race.... Thus, the knot of Eve's disobedience was loosed by the obedience of Mary. What the virgin Eve had bound in unbelief, the virgin Mary loosed through faith."  -Saint Irenaeus, Against the Heresies, Book II, 180 AD
The amazing thing is that Mary could have said “no” to this child, but she didn’t and because she didn’t every generation shall call her blessed (Lk 1:48).

As Catholics we need to remember that we are Catholics not “Pro-Lifers”, though at times those two terms may be synonymous they are not always.  The Pro-Life movement in many cases is not Catholic, and all too often its champions and heroes are not Catholic and when they fail it hurts the Pro-Life movement and it’s message and often scandalizes many Catholics.

We need to remember that as Catholics our heroes and role models must be first of all Our Lord and Our Lady and then the Saints.  We must look to them as our examples and point to them as the basis of our convictions.


I’ve heard far too many conversations amongst younger Catholics and younger Catholic couples concerning their disposition about how many children they want/expect to have.  And I have to say that in almost all cases I was most un-edified.

I find that all too often young Catholics are so deeply and subtly poisoned by the world in which we live that totally unaware of what is happening they begin to adopt the position which they believe they actually hold against.  And while so many young "Pro-Life" Catholics say they reject contraception they have unknowingly imbibed a contraceptive mentality from the culture they live in.

I wonder then if the great Saints we hope and pray for in these dark days simply have not come because they have not been allowed to be born in all too many cases.

I began considering who we might not have had if Catholics of past generations thought as so many Catholics think today.

The most striking example of the consequences of a lack of openness to life might have to be to consider what might have happened if the parents of Saint Vincent Ferrer had not been open to life?  He was their 4th child and he would go on to actually avert the end of the world.  So had his parents thought 2 or 3 children were "enough" then you and I and everyone who was born, has lived, and who have died since the middle of the 14th century would never have existed.

And what if the great and noble Fieschi family had not been open to life?  We wouldn’t have known the youngest of their 5 children: Saint Catherine of Genoa.

Or what about Saint Gerard Majella who was also the youngest of 5 and who we now have as the patron Saint of expectant mothers?!

And what a great loss to the Church, and the world, it would have been if we had not had Saint Margaret Mary Alacoque to whom our Lord revealed his Most Sacred Heart so that it could once again be better known as it once was.  She was the 5th of 7 children.

How much would the world and the Church have lost had not that noble family of Napels in the 13th century had their 6th and youngest child?  If they had not been open to life we would not have the greatest thinker, philosopher, and theologian the world has ever seen.  Saint Albert the Great would never have had his unmatched pupil to teach, the Council of Trent wouldn’t have had the clear and sure guide in that great gem of the Dominican Order from which to base the majority of their pronouncements, for indeed we would have been deprived of Saint Thomas Aquinas!

Easily the most incredible example of a saintly and large family is the family of Saint Bernard of Clairvaux who was the 3rd of 7 children all of whom have been canonized including their parents, as well as the spouse and daughter of the eldest son.  The entire amazing store is recounted in “The Family That Overtook Christ”.

And then we come to my favorite Saint who is most dear to my heart and who was born not all that long ago in 1873.  She was the youngest of 9 children.  What if Saints Louis and Zelie Martin were not open to any more children, especially after they had lost four children in infancy?  We would never have had that young Carmelite who has touched the lives of countless souls, become the 33rd Doctor of the Church, whose name was taken in religious life by Blessed Mother Teresa, and who was called by Pope Saint Pius X: “the greatest Saint of modern times”.  The world would have been deprived of Saint Therese of the Child Jesus and of the Holy Face.

And what about the great hero of Pro-Life Catholics: Saint Gianna Beretta Molla?  What if her parents hadn’t been open to life?  She was the 10th of 13 children in her family, and she would never have given birth to her four children (the last of whom she died so that they could be born).

Another incredible family to go along with that of the Clairvaux’ is the family of Saint Basil the Great who was 1 of 10 children including also Saint Gregory of Nyssa and the youngest of the 10 was another Saint: Peter of Sebaste.  Their mother, Emilia, is also a Saint.

Consider also, when our Lady appeared in Fatima Portugal, how many children would she have met tending the sheep if Ti Marto and his wife had not been open to life despite being poor farmers?  Only Lucia would have been there and not her two youngest cousins who were the 10th and 11th children in their family, and we would not have dear Blessed Francisco and Jacinta Marto of Fatima.

Living at the same time we have a great and holy Saint: Gabriel Possenti, known in religion as Gabriel of our Lady of Sorrows, who was the special mystical friend of Saint Gemma Galgani.  He too wouldn’t have existed because he was the 11th of 13 children.

Still more terrible would it have been for the world if a certain set of parents hadn't been open to life.  These were the parents of the founder of one of the most prolific missionary religious orders in history.  How many countless souls would have been lost and how many saints would not have been able to pursue a vocation in the once great Jesuit order if it had never existed if Saint Ignatius of Loyola had never been born since he was the youngest of 13 children.

And for those who say that these numbers are more reasonable and that Catholics can’t be expected to have 20+ children let us recall one more example.  She is quite possibly one of the most influential Saints in the history of the Church and thus was declared a Doctor of the Church.  She is also one of the holiest Saints in all of history, and she had a powerful influence on me personally when I was young.  Of course she is the great Saint Catherine of Siena and what if her parents had stopped at 15 children?  Or even 20?  Then we wouldn’t have ever known their 25th and youngest child who brought the Pope back from Avignon to Rome.  She also did a great deal for both of her parents.  She converted her mother so far as to cause her to join the convent she lived in, and suffered all the pains of purgatory due to her father for him.  Had they had only 24 children they would not have had this immense blessing, nor the Church, nor the world.

Still, more than all these stories there is one that moves me to tears every time I hear it, and it is that of a priest I know who has had a massive, even life altering, effect on my life by his preaching.  

In a sermon discussing the common misuse of NFP by many Catholics he explains, in a way that pierces the heart, the fact that he is happy to exist considering that he is the son of a 10th child, his mother is the daughter of an 11th child and his father the son of a 10th child and the grandson of a 19th child.  

Had any of a number of people over generations not done their duty according to their state in life as married men and women then this good and holy priest would never have existed and so deeply touched my life and the lives of so many others, as he is still continuing to do to this day.


Friday, June 5, 2015

Mary and our Hidden and Forgotten Treasure

The first and most natural consequence of True Devotion to Mary and the Consecration to Jesus through Mary is an irresistible desire for the Blessed Sacrament, both the reception of Him at Holy Mass as well as the visiting of Him wherever He is present.  This, at least, has been my own experience, and something that Montfort expects will be the case as well.

Thus the first book by that great devotee of our Lady, Saint Alphonsus Maria de Ligouri, that I ever purchased was not, as one might suspect, The Glories of Mary but actually the tiny little work: Visits to the Blessed Sacrament and the Blessed Virgin Mary.

This little book, far too little know today even by most Catholics, is in fact the first of the 111 books he would publish in his life (published in 1745), and which was originally shorter and only for the members of his fledgling religious community: The Redemptorists.  Due to its popularity and great fruit it produced he expanded the work to have a “visit” for every day of the month, and it was made available to the faithful.  And is actually one of the most published books in human history, boasting more than 2000 editions across all languages.  The book can usually be purchased for just a few dollars and ought to be daily reading for every Catholic.

One section in this work struck me very deeply all those years ago and has stayed with me always in my mind…

Many Christians submit to great fatigue, and expose themselves to many dangers, to visit the places in the Holy Land where our most loving Saviour was born, suffered, and died. We need not undertake so long a journey, or expose ourselves to so many dangers; the same Lord is near us, and dwells in the church, only a few steps distant from our houses. If pilgrims, says St. Paulinus, consider it a great thing to bring back a little dust from the crib, or from the holy sepulchre in which Jesus was buried; with what ardour should not we visit the Most Blessed Sacrament, where the same Jesus is in person, and where we can go without encountering so much fatigue and so many dangers!
At the time when I read this I was in college and knew many young Catholics willing to go through a great deal to visit a National Shrine, Rome, Jerusalem, ect but wouldn’t walk a few hundred meters or drive a few minutes to visit our Lord truly present in the Most Blessed Sacrament.

This is something that I continue to see applied both to visiting our Lord within the context of Holy Mass and especially outside of it.

What also bothers me is that people will make a special trip to come hear Holy Mass because of the particular Priest, Bishop, or Cardinal offering the Mass even through the Mass is a regularly offered week day Mass that they could attend every week and where one far greater than any prelate is always going to be present!

And, though I admit I am guilty of neglecting to always visit Him on a daily basis even when I could, how many times have I visited our Lord and found the Church empty without anyone there to keep Him company.  It breaks my heart to see so few visiting Him when there are thousands of people in these parishes, and I can go weeks without running into another soul while visiting our Lord for an hour or more at a time each day.

One other concern, which might seem very strange to suggest, but which was a concern I heard voiced by a very holy monastic Priest who has devoted his life and founded a community around adoration of the Blessed Sacrament, is that because so called “perpetual adoration” where the Blessed Sacrament is exposed in a monstrance for most or all of each week has become more and more popular (and in my diocese it is very common) it has reinforced a faulty mentality that it’s not the same when we visit our Lord hidden in the tabernacle and thus if He is not exposed for adoration He is never visited.  And this has been my experience for many years visiting many parishes with perpetual adoration where those adoration chapels are always occupied but our Lord is left cold and alone in the Church.

The exposition of the Blessed Sacrament really ought to be something rare and special and for great and special feasts.  The rest of the time we can visit our Lord while he resides in the tabernacle.  He is no less there and no less able to hear our prayers when He is there, and we have the opportunity to humble ourselves and to make reparation by adoring Him in His hiddeness.

Our Lord loves us so very much and desires to be with us and to speak to us and pour out His mercy and graces upon us.  If we would only give Him the opportunity to do so O how He would bless us for keeping Him company!  I cannot tell you all the many wonderful effects He has brought about in my life from my frequent visits to Him that our Lady inspired(s) me to make.

If we really desire to be a Saint then we ought to desire to be always with our Lord as much as we can be.  Reading the lives of the Saints there are many examples of Saints so devoted to our Lord that if they passed by a Church where He was present they couldn't help but "stop in" to say hello and in many cases would stay for some time in conversation with our dear Jesus.

These frequent visits to our Lord are in fact one of the very questions they ask about a person who is put forth for canonization:
Did he pray long and frequently before the Blessed Sacrament?

Let us conclude by meditating upon the rest of the 23rd Visit from the afore mention work the first part of which was quoted above… 

A religious person, to whom God gave great love for the Most Blessed Sacrament, amongst other things, wrote as follows in a letter: 'I see that every good thing that I have comes to me from the Most Blessed Sacrament. I have given and consecrated my whole self to Jesus in this Sacrament. I see innumerable graces, which are not granted because people do not go to this Divine Sacrament. I see the great desire that our Lord has to dispense His graces in the Sacrament. O holy mystery! O sacred Host! Where is it that God manifests His power the most, if it is not in this Host? For this Host contains all that God has ever done for us. Let us not envy the blessed who are in heaven, since on earth we have the same Lord, with greater wonders of His love. Endeavour that all with whom you speak should devote themselves to the Most Blessed Sacrament. I speak thus, because this Sacrament makes me beside myself. Neither can I cease speaking of the Most Blessed Sacrament, which deserves so greatly to be loved. I know not what to do for Jesus in this Sacrament,' Thus the letter ends.


O Seraphim, who remain sweetly burning with love around your and my Lord; though it is not indeed for love of you but of me that this King of Heaven is pleased to be present in this Sacrament,—O loving Angels, let me also burn with love; and do you enkindle your love in me, that with you I also may burn! O my Jesus, teach me to know the greatness of the love which Thou bearest to men, that at the sight of so great love, my desire to love Thee and please Thee may go on always increasing! I love Thee, most amiable Lord, and will always love Thee; and this alone to please Thee.